Showing posts with label Exit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Exit. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 June 2013

Shares Versus Assets: It is Mostly About Minimizing Net Taxes

Company acquisitions can be in the form of a share purchase or an asset purchase.  Both can accommodate the full transfer of a going concern business.  The fundamental difference is that in a share sale, the shareholders sell their shares and receive the proceeds personally (i.e. the legal entity that owns the assets changes hands) and, in an asset sale, the legal entity sells all of its assets including its name, IP, brand, customer contracts etc., and remains as a legal entity owned by the shareholders but now just has the sale proceeds as its main asset.  A second taxable step of distributing the cash to the shareholders will have to take place for the shareholders to make use of the proceeds.  Sellers that pursue this option may have plans for the company to re-invest the proceeds thereby deferring the tax impact.
So how are they different and which is better for a seller or a buyer?  Ultimately, it is after-tax free cashflow or net cash in hand that drives the value, purchase price and optimal structure.  The tax impact, whether it is reduced capital gains tax for the seller or lower go-forward income tax for the buyer, is usually the biggest driver in the decision between a share or asset sale. 
Buyers will prefer an asset purchase when the purchase price is largely allocated to depreciable assets because they will benefit from higher CCA going forward.  Sellers will prefer share sales when the $750,000 lifetime capital gains tax exemption has a material impact on the proceeds.  In some cases additional family members can benefit from the lifetime capital gains tax exemption by enacting an estate freeze and creating trusts for the children.  However, it must be noted that any shareholder will have to have owned their shares for at least two years for the lifetime capital gains tax exemption to apply so this can’t be done at the last minute. For a family with three children this can increase the exemption from $750,000 to $3,000,000; a big impact for transactions up to $5 million.  For larger transactions it becomes more complex for sellers as depreciable tangible property may incur taxable recaptured depreciation or, where a significant amount of the sale price is allocated to goodwill, 50% of the profit on the sale of Goodwill is exempt from tax.
Beyond tax there are other factors to consider such as:
-       Buyers prefer asset purchases because they avoid the issue of possible skeletons in the closet (undisclosed liabilities)
-       Buyers will seek more reps and warranties in a share purchase agreement as they look to protect themselves from potentially undisclosed liabilities
-       Sellers should consider the risks of possibly having to renegotiate key contracts with customers and employees in the case of an asset sale (where contracts include a change of control provision)

When selling your business, weigh the answers to the following questions to choose your path:
-       Will you benefit substantially from the lifetime capital gains exemption?
-       Will the lion share of the purchase price be allocated to depreciable assets or goodwill?
-       Will transferring contracts (customers/employees) be difficult?
-       Do you have a compelling opportunity to use the funds in the company?

The tax issue can be a complicated one, however, non-tax items such as obtaining customer consents, can sometimes trump it entirely and, if you are indifferent from a tax perspective, the flexibility to pursue either option may provide some helpful negotiating leverage.  For a more detailed analysis of both the seller and buyer impacts see the Veracap M&A Value Strategies newsletter here.

Derek van der Plaat, CFA has worked in private market M&A for more than 20 years and is a Managing Director with Veracap M&A International in Toronto.

Thursday, 28 June 2012

I Have a Buyer for your Business

My previous post was about niche businesses and those owner-entrepreneurs wondering if there could be more than one buyer for their business.  There are other sectors that include many competitors.  Just within the IT sector I am thinking of Cisco resellers, Microsoft SharePoint or Dynamics shops, IT solutions companies focused on virtualization and cloud strategies.
Some M&A advisors will approach companies in these sectors and say “I have several buyers for your business.  In fact I know the CEO of ABC Co. and the CEO of XYZ Co., they are good friends of mine and they are keen to buy your business”.  Some business brokers will say they have 100’s of buyers ready to go BUT the likelihood that these are really strategic and actually able to acquire is very small.
So, how do you separate fact from fiction and secondly, how important are buyer relationships? 
Recently closed transactions in the space and client references from those deals (see veracap.com/experience/transactions and veracap.com/experience/testimonials) are verifiable evidence of capability and up-to-date market knowledge.
However, they should not be the only factor in choosing an investment banker to advise in the sale of a business.  Having done deals in a sector renders the mandate more efficient for the advisor by: (i) knowing up-to-date acquisition terms and pricing and (ii) the appetite and ability of potential buyers, but securing a number of desirable offers is ultimately what the seller is looking for.  To achieve that you need an advisor who will work tirelessly on your behalf, not just forward the first offer received and pressure the seller to take it.  You need a company champion who will spend the time, leave no stone unturned and who will fight for your best interest.  Having done deals in the sector may lead to short-cutting the process believing that certain companies are active buyers and others are not buyers at all. Such assumptions will limit the potential that could otherwise be achieved.
As I have noted several times, the best buyer is not likely to be a direct competitor (who could not pay a strong price if they were just interested in acquiring the customer base) but a “platform buyer”.  A platform buyer will be interested in the business for one of three reasons, its customers, its personnel, or its technology. Platform buyers are good buyers because they typically leave the existing assets in tact (brands, people) and usually bring a growth opportunity that allows them to pay a good price and provides the company sold with new opportunities.
So should buyer relationships drive your choice in investment bankers?  An advisor knowing a CEO who wants to buy your business (even if for argument’s sake that company is Cisco or Oracle – pick any leader in its space) does not guarantee a good price or even a good offer.  Only by going to market with an experienced advisor who (i) understands the business and has presented the opportunity strategically, (ii) conducts a thorough process and, (iii) has the time and interest to put your company first, can you secure the best price for your company.

Derek van der Plaat, CFA has worked in private market M&A for more than 20 years and is a Managing Director with Veracap Corporate Finance in Toronto.