Friday, 21 October 2011
How Do I Attract a High Multiple for My Business: The Business Factors
There are two broad answers to this question. The first concerns the business itself and the second concerns the sale process. The how, when and why of selling. I will address the business issues in this post; not to say invent a new mouse trap but from the perspective of what factors you can influence in your existing business to improve value.
In “The Basic Math of Valuations” I presented the risk return curve. A company will attract a higher multiple if it moves to the left on the risk return curve; i.e. a higher multiple is paid for lower risk, but, the biggest driver in attaining a higher multiple is a company’s profitable growth prospects, and, this should already be evidenced by a historical growth record.
Let’s look at the public markets for an illustration. The dividend discount model asserts that the fair value of a stock is the present value of all future dividends. The formula is as follows: fair value of a stock = DPS(1) / Ks-g, where the expected future dividend stream is divided by the required rate of return (Ks) minus the expected growth rate (g). If a dividend is $5.00 and the required rate of return is 20% then the fair value of the share price is $25.00 ($5.00/0.2) according to this model. If the expected growth rate is 10% then the fair value jumps to $50.00 ($5.00/0.1). The growth rate lowers the required rate of return and increases the fair value of a stock. In this case, 10% per annum growth translates into 100% price improvement. That is a tremendous amount. The real world experience is not as exact but the illustration demonstrates the logic and impact of growth prospects on company value.
The same logic applies to EBITDA growth for private companies. Returning to the example provided in the previous post - a company sustainably generating $5 million in EBITDA is valued at $20 million, four times EBITDA, the equivalent to generating a 25% return on capital per annum - if this company were growing at 20% per annum, the multiple could quite readily improve to 6 or 7 resulting in a valuation of $30 to $35 million. Again, not quite as exact as the formula but the results are still very substantial.
Now, turning our attention to reducing risk, here are some factors to consider:
Is the owner redundant?
The first thing to address when considering selling a business is to put a strong management team in place that can run the business without the owner. An owner-operator who is the chief product developer or maintains all of the customer relationships will not be able to exit the business upon its sale. He/she will have to commit to staying with the business until a suitable replacement solution is implemented.
Is the customer base diversified?
The opportunity to supply a major retailer (i.e. Wal-Mart or Home Depot) or a major manufacturer (Ford or GE) can be a tremendous opportunity for a smaller company but it can also drain a lot of resources and result in pressure on margins and tremendous customer concentration. While the growth that it drives will increase value the associated risk of these revenues will reduce value.
Are the revenues recurring or project based?
Does every fiscal year start at zero? What I mean by that is, if your revenues are project based then you are always searching for the next deal. Consulting companies typically face this challenge. Along the same lines, a one product company is more risky than a diversified product and services company.
These are three examples of situations where reducing the risk will increase the multiple but the concept applies in general; any combination of improving profitable growth prospects and reducing risk will increase the value of your company.
Derek van der Plaat, CFA has worked in private market M&A for more than 20 years and is a Managing Director with Veracap Corporate Finance in Toronto.